Compare / GPT-6 Luna vs GLM 5.3 Flash

GPT-6 Luna vs GLM 5.3 Flash

18 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI · profile
GLM 5.3 Flash
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricGPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 Flash
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 44.3%52.8%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate 0.050.07
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate -0.03-0.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate 0.02-0.01
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate 0.000.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4221,467
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4521,463
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4031,433
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5051,510
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4431,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4421,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4151,450
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 38.141.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 38.5%39.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 83.3%80.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 54.6%51.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 12.6%32.8%
GDP.pdfreportedProfessional document tasks% of rubric 23.0%14.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.