Compare / gpt-oss-120b vs GLM 5.3 Flash

gpt-oss-120b vs GLM 5.3 Flash

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

gpt-oss-120b
OpenAI · profile
GLM 5.3 Flash
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricgpt-oss-120bGLM 5.3 Flash
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 4.4%52.8%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3851,467
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3511,463
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2771,433
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3571,510
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3231,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3521,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3091,450
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 30.471.5
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 11.641.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 78.2%91.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 19.6%39.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 52.0%80.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 34.0%51.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 26.2%84.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 0.0%32.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 12.8%47.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.