Compare / grok-4-1-fast-reasoning vs GLM 5.2

grok-4-1-fast-reasoning vs GLM 5.2

18 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

grok-4-1-fast-reasoning
xAI · profile
GLM 5.2
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricgrok-4-1-fast-reasoningGLM 5.2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4131,463
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4171,463
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4141,455
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4381,500
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4011,470
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4301,476
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4071,459
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 20.433.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 85.3%89.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 19.3%41.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 52.7%73.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 74.0%78.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 24.2%50.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 93.3%99.1%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 7.0%12.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.330.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 51.367.0
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $1,106.63$8,313.78

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.