Compare / grok-4.20-0309-reasoning vs GLM 5.2

grok-4.20-0309-reasoning vs GLM 5.2

11 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

grok-4.20-0309-reasoning
xAI · profile
GLM 5.2
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
11
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricgrok-4.20-0309-reasoningGLM 5.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 25.233.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 88.5%89.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 32.4%41.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 82.9%73.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 67.7%78.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 40.9%50.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 96.5%99.1%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 30.2%34.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 46.0%12.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.330.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 55.367.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.