Compare / grok-4-fast-reasoning vs GLM 4.6V

grok-4-fast-reasoning vs GLM 4.6V

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

grok-4-fast-reasoning
xAI · profile
GLM 4.6V
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricgrok-4-fast-reasoningGLM 4.6V
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4171,392
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4031,370
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3831,350
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4211,394
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3891,367
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4051,379
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3881,357
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 17.911.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 84.7%71.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 19.1%9.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 50.5%30.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 73.7%48.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 18.9%14.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 65.8%31.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 23.0%35.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.330.39
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 53.439.7

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.