Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

DeepSeek · budget

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro good?

DeepSeek V4 Pro has been tested across 13 task areas. It's strongest at frontend & landing pages and weakest at data & analytics. It's a budget-friendly option ($1.305/1M tokens).

Top-3 finishes
13/22
Task areas tested
$1.305
Per 1M tokens
Slow
Typical speed

Our take

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro is a budget-tier model that we tested across 4 task areas. It performs best at Chef / Home Cooking.

Strengths

Clarity Specificity Concision Tone Risk handling Usefulness

Weak spots

Appropriate caveats Visual design Practical sequencing Explanation quality Food quality Timing accuracy

How DeepSeek V4 Pro ranks, task by task

Rank is the position in each field; Rating is the absolute quality bar. A model can be rated "Excellent" yet sit mid-table when the whole field is strong — and vice-versa.

Task area Rank
Frontend & Landing Pages #5 of 103
Knowledge & Docs #24 of 104
Chef / Home Cooking #31 of 120
Content & Brand #34 of 118
Coding #36 of 109
Executive Assistant #35 of 106
Landing Pages #24 of 66
Legal & HR #38 of 104
Customer Support #44 of 107
Investor & Pitch #26 of 60
Creative & Comedy #47 of 104
AI Strategy #59 of 120
Data & Analytics #54 of 104

Industry benchmarks

Standardized third-party scores, shown for context — these are independent of our real-task tests.

Artificial Analysis indices

44.3
Intelligence
59.4
Coding
36.4
Agentic

Design Arena — human preference (avg Elo 1259)

3d 1327 svg 1194 dataviz 1220 gamedev 1296 website 1279 asciiart 1198 uicomponent 1271 codecategories 1288

Headline vs. real-world

DeepSeek V4 Pro's real-world results broadly track its headline Intelligence Index.

Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-07-02) · Source: Design Arena (www.designarena.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-07-02)

Like DeepSeek V4 Pro, but…

Cheaper

No clear alternative.

Smarter

Frequently asked

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro any good?

DeepSeek V4 Pro places top-3 in 0 of 13 task areas we benchmarked. It performs best at Frontend & Landing Pages.

What is DeepSeek V4 Pro best at?

Its strongest task areas are Frontend & Landing Pages, Knowledge & Docs, Chef / Home Cooking.

How we test & rank

Each model is scored on real tasks across 13 task areas by an LLM judge with deterministic checks. "Percentile" is this model's standing within each area's field; the cross-area figures are rank-based so quality and Elo scores are never mixed.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s