Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Google · budget

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite good?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has been tested across 22 task areas. It's strongest at frontend & landing pages and weakest at research & competitive analysis. It's a budget-friendly option ($1.75/1M tokens).

Top-3 finishes
22/22
Task areas tested
$1.75
Per 1M tokens
Moderate
Typical speed

Our take

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is a budget-tier model that we tested across 22 task areas. It performs best at Frontend & Landing Pages, and is weakest at Research & Competitive Analysis.

Strengths

Clarity Concision Specificity Usefulness Structure Tone

Weak spots

Visual design Grounding attribution Practical sequencing Food quality Timing accuracy Appropriate caveats

How Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite ranks, task by task

Rank is the position in each field; Rating is the absolute quality bar. A model can be rated "Excellent" yet sit mid-table when the whole field is strong — and vice-versa.

Task area Rank
Frontend & Landing Pages #6 of 93
Landing Pages #7 of 56
Content & Brand #7 of 50
Creative & Comedy #9 of 44
Knowledge & Docs #26 of 94
Data & Analytics #21 of 69
Training & Education #14 of 44
Structured Output #14 of 43
Product & Project Management #15 of 44
Coding #18 of 52
RAG, Safety & Grounding #13 of 35
AI Strategy #23 of 50
Customer Support #21 of 43
Investor & Pitch #26 of 50
Summarization & Meeting Notes #26 of 44
Chef / Home Cooking #32 of 50
Sales #33 of 44
Translation & Localization #34 of 44
Legal & HR #37 of 44
Executive Assistant #46 of 50
Presentations & Decks #41 of 44
Research & Competitive Analysis #43 of 44

Industry benchmarks

Standardized third-party scores, shown for context — these are independent of our real-task tests.

Headline vs. real-world

Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29) · Source: Design Arena (www.designarena.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29)

Like Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, but…

Cheaper

Smarter

Frequently asked

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite any good?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite places top-3 in 0 of 22 task areas we benchmarked. It performs best at Frontend & Landing Pages.

What is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite best at?

Its strongest task areas are Frontend & Landing Pages, Landing Pages, Content & Brand.

Is there a cheaper alternative to Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?

DeepSeek V3.2 is 67% cheaper and stays competitive on quality across our benchmarks.

How we test & rank

Each model is scored on real tasks across 22 task areas by an LLM judge with deterministic checks. "Percentile" is this model's standing within each area's field; the cross-area figures are rank-based so quality and Elo scores are never mixed.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s