Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Planned benchmark facet · ranking not published

Which models are best at testing and debugging?

Find failures, write useful tests, and repair root causes.

This is the evaluation plan, not a model leaderboard.

No model order or score is shown. Candidate external benchmarks and planned first-party comparisons become evidence only after their exact release gates pass; retired benchmark grades are not reused.

First-party pairwise plan

Six distinct tasks for this facet

5

exploration tasks

Used for comparison coverage and calibrated refinement.

1

sealed holdout task

Kept out of model and judge tuning until release validation.

6

tasks in total

One of four equally weighted facets in this collection.

First-party, task-local pairwise comparisons with deterministic validators acting as hard gates. The final task remains sealed from model and judge tuning until release validation.

Collection-level external evidence map

Candidate benchmarks that can inform this skill

These sources are mapped to Software Engineering & Coding, then identity-partitioned and lineage-deduplicated. They are supporting inputs, not a substitute for direct task-local pairwise results, and no score is reproduced on this page.

Artificial Analysis

Coding and Coding Agent indices

Mapped and runnable
Evidence role
primary
Maximum directness
70%
Declared subject
harnessed model
Usable lineages mapped
4

Capabilities: coding, repository engineering, terminal work, repository understanding.

Mapped fields: SciCode, DeepSWE, Terminal-Bench v2 (Coding Agent Index), SWE-Atlas-QnA.

  • • source redistribution is conditional: assumed
  • • metric subject identity differs from the editorial mapping; publish and calibrate each identity partition separately

Microsoft BenchPress Score Matrix

BenchPress observed coding rows

Mapped and runnable
Evidence role
supporting
Maximum directness
60%
Declared subject
harnessed model
Usable lineages mapped
4

Capabilities: code editing, code generation, issue resolution, terminal work.

Mapped fields: BenchPress verified canonical row — Aider Polyglot (diff mode), BenchPress verified canonical row — LiveCodeBench v6, BenchPress verified canonical row — SWE-bench Pro, BenchPress verified canonical row — Terminal-Bench Hard.

OpenHands Index

OpenHands Index

Mapped and runnable
Evidence role
primary
Maximum directness
85%
Declared subject
agent
Usable lineages mapped
3

Capabilities: issue resolution, greenfield implementation, testing.

Mapped fields: OpenHands Index — Issue Resolution, OpenHands Index — Greenfield, OpenHands Index — Testing.

  • • metric subject identity differs from the editorial mapping; publish and calibrate each identity partition separately

Current blockers

Why no ranking is live

  • No approved combined collection artifact has been released.
  • The parent collection has not passed its publication gate.
  • No approved facet-level result artifact has been released.

Publication gate

What must pass first

  1. 1Combine at least one eligible external result with at least one first-party pairwise result.
  2. 2Retain at least 2 independent evidence lineages and 8 eligible model configurations.
  3. 3Complete at least 3 facet tasks with at least 80% required-task coverage.
  4. 4Show that this facet is materially distinct, then pass reliability and sealed-release stability checks.

Software Engineering & Coding

Explore all four planned skills

Back to Software Engineering & Coding Sources and safeguards