Compare / Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Claude Opus 4.7

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Claude Opus 4.7

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba · profile
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Claude Opus 4.7? The short answer

  • Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is cheaper: $0.37 against $10.00 per million tokens, 27 times less.
  • Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 40.7 against 7.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.7 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Qwen2.5 72B InstructClaude Opus 4.7
Price per million tokens$0.36 in · $0.40 out$5.00 in · $25.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.37$10.00
Cheapest host, blended$0.37 (DeepInfra, FP8)$10.00 (Claude Platform on AWS)
Intelligence Index7.740.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window32,768 tokens1,000,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen2.5 72B InstructClaude Opus 4.7
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls not measured 25 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 23 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 175 of 195 26 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 159 of 187 25 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 54 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen2.5 72B InstructClaude Opus 4.7
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,2991,508
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2541,488
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,2951,535
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2921,503
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3031,502
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,2821,496
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 7.7040.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 49.1%91.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 3.6%42.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 36.9%58.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 4.5%54.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 34.5%88.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 21.0%1.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.41
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 31.561.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better than Claude Opus 4.7?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Claude Opus 4.7 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Claude Opus 4.7?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.37 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $10.00 for Claude Opus 4.7.

Run Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Claude Opus 4.7 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.