Compare / Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Command A

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Command A

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba · profile
Command A
Cohere · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Command A? The short answer

  • Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is cheaper: $0.37 against $4.38 per million tokens, 12 times less.
  • They score about the same on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (7.7 and 7.0).
  • On our business benchmarks, Command A ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Qwen2.5 72B InstructCommand A
Price per million tokens$0.36 in · $0.40 out$2.50 in · $10.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.37$4.38
Cheapest host, blended$0.37 (DeepInfra, FP8)–
Intelligence Index7.77.0
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–61
Context window32,768 tokens256,000 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinaCanada

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen2.5 72B InstructCommand A
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls not measured 67 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 175 of 195 170 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 159 of 187 124 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 113 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen2.5 72B InstructCommand A
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,2991,351
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2541,336
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,2951,344
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2921,342
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3031,354
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,2821,348
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 7.707.00
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 49.1%52.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 3.6%4.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 36.9%36.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 4.5%0.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 34.5%15.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 21.0%21.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.35
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 31.540.6

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better than Command A?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Command A ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Command A?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.37 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $4.38 for Command A.

Run Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Command A on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.