Compare / Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 14 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus? The short answer
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is cheaper: $0.37 against $0.45 per million tokens, 18% less.
- DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 14.8 against 7.7.
- On our business benchmarks, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
At a glance
| Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.36 in · $0.40 out | $0.27 in · $1.00 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.37 | $0.45 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.37 (DeepInfra, FP8) | $0.45 (SiliconFlow, FP8) |
| Intelligence Index | 7.7 | 14.8 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | – |
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 163,840 tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | China | China |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | not measured | 84 of 161 |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 175 of 195 | 105 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 159 of 187 | 79 of 187 |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,299 | 1,423 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,254 | 1,405 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,292 | 1,420 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,303 | 1,417 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,282 | 1,411 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 7.70 | 14.8 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 49.1% | 79.2% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 3.6% | 16.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 36.9% | 57.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 4.5% | 31.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 34.5% | 37.1% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 21.0% | 32.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.36 | 0.37 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 31.5 | 54.0 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.37 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.45 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus.
Run Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.