Compare / Qwen3 14B vs GPT-5.5

Qwen3 14B vs GPT-5.5

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3 14B
Alibaba · profile
GPT-5.5
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

Qwen3 14B or GPT-5.5? The short answer

  • Qwen3 14B is cheaper: $0.15 against $11.25 per million tokens, 75 times less.
  • GPT-5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 38.4 against 8.2.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3 14B ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, GPT-5.5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Qwen3 14BGPT-5.5
Price per million tokens$0.12 in · $0.24 out$5.00 in · $30.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.15$11.25
Cheapest host, blended$0.13 (NextBit, INT4)$5.62 (OpenAI)
Intelligence Index8.238.4
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window131,072 tokens1,050,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3 14BGPT-5.5
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 120 of 161 22 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 14 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 159 of 195 19 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 128 of 187 14 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 17 of 153 30 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3 14BGPT-5.5
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 13.874.9
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 8.2038.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 60.4%93.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 4.5%45.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 40.5%75.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 0.0%84.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 30.7%56.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 4.9%84.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 0.0%14.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 5.3%60.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 5.6%39.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 34.5%93.9%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 20.0%13.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.370.41
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 34.869.7
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.9%100.0%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 5.4%9.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3 14B better than GPT-5.5?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3 14B ranks higher for sticking to the facts; GPT-5.5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 14B or GPT-5.5?

Qwen3 14B costs $0.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $11.25 for GPT-5.5.

Run Qwen3 14B and GPT-5.5 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.