Compare / Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Step 3.5 Flash

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Step 3.5 Flash

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Alibaba · profile
Step 3.5 Flash
Stepfun · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or Step 3.5 Flash? The short answer

  • Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper: $0.15 against $0.30 per million tokens, 50% less.
  • Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 16.6 against 12.0.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 ranks higher for writing and sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, Step 3.5 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

At a glance

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Step 3.5 Flash
Price per million tokens$0.15 in · $0.75 out$0.10 in · $0.30 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.30$0.15
Cheapest host, blended$0.15 (GMICloud, FP8)–
Intelligence Index12.016.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinaChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Step 3.5 Flash
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 49 of 161 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 125 of 195 96 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 83 of 187 99 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 97 of 153 123 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Step 3.5 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4311,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4321,390
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3781,345
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4481,429
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4141,384
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4221,393
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3961,366
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 12.016.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 75.3%83.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 11.1%21.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 46.1%64.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 33.9%50.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 15.2%27.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 33.3%94.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 15.0%42.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 49.045.9

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 better than Step 3.5 Flash?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 ranks higher for writing and sticking to the facts; Step 3.5 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.30 for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507.

Run Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Step 3.5 Flash on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.