Compare / Qwen3 235B A22B vs DeepSeek V3.2 Exp

Qwen3 235B A22B vs DeepSeek V3.2 Exp

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3 235B A22B
Alibaba · profile
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Qwen3 235B A22B or DeepSeek V3.2 Exp? The short answer

  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is cheaper: $0.30 against $0.80 per million tokens, 2.6 times less.
  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 16.6 against 9.5.
  • On our business benchmarks, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Qwen3 235B A22BDeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Price per million tokens$0.46 in · $1.82 out$0.27 in · $0.41 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.80$0.30
Cheapest host, blended––
Intelligence Index9.516.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window131,072 tokens163,840 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinaChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3 235B A22BDeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls not measured 70 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 137 of 195 102 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 102 of 187 69 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 64 of 153 41 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3 235B A22BDeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4141,422
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3661,409
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3951,449
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3811,416
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4031,425
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3781,410
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 9.5016.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 70.0%79.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 11.0%14.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 38.7%54.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 0.0%72.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 6.1%31.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 27.2%33.9%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 94.9%96.6%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 9.3%5.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3 235B A22B better than DeepSeek V3.2 Exp?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B or DeepSeek V3.2 Exp?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.30 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.80 for Qwen3 235B A22B.

Run Qwen3 235B A22B and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.