Compare / Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs R1

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs R1

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Alibaba · profile
R1
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or R1? The short answer

  • Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper: $0.14 against $1.15 per million tokens, 8.1 times less.
  • R1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 11.4 against 7.5.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 ranks higher for agents and tool use.
  • On our business benchmarks, R1 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507R1
Price per million tokens$0.090 in · $0.30 out$0.70 in · $2.50 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.14$1.15
Cheapest host, blended$0.084 (StreamLake)–
Intelligence Index7.511.4
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window262,144 tokens64,000 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinaChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507R1
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 72 of 161 123 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 156 of 195 133 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 139 of 187 89 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 110 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507R1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3971,388
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3191,374
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3951,402
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3661,397
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3831,398
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3421,382
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 7.5011.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 65.9%70.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 6.9%8.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 33.1%39.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 26.3%57.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 6.1%6.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 10.2%11.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 13.0%18.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.310.30
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 27.951.8

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 better than R1?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 ranks higher for agents and tool use; R1 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or R1?

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.14 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.15 for R1.

Run Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and R1 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.