Compare / Qwen3 32B vs Ministral 3 14B 2512
Qwen3 32B vs Ministral 3 14B 2512
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Qwen3 32B or Ministral 3 14B 2512? The short answer
- Ministral 3 14B 2512 is cheaper: $0.20 against $0.21 per million tokens, 2% less.
- Qwen3 32B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 8.6 against 6.0.
- On our business benchmarks, Qwen3 32B ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.
At a glance
| Qwen3 32B | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.14 in · $0.40 out | $0.20 in · $0.20 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.21 | $0.20 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.13 (DeepInfra, FP8) | $0.20 (Mistral) |
| Intelligence Index | 8.6 | 6.0 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | 91 |
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | China | France |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Qwen3 32B | Ministral 3 14B 2512 |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | 111 of 161 | 128 of 161 |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 145 of 195 | 167 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 137 of 187 | 143 of 187 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | 23 of 153 | 146 of 153 |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3 32B | Ministral 3 14B 2512 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 15.3 | 14.4 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 8.60 | 6.00 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 66.8% | 57.2% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 7.4% | 4.6% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 36.3% | 32.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 0.0% | 26.3% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 36.0% | 23.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 5.2% | 9.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 3.0% | 4.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 5.4% | 6.6% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 29.8% | 27.2% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 19.0% | 24.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 33.0 | 31.4 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.9% | 99.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 5.9% | 19.4% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is Qwen3 32B better than Ministral 3 14B 2512?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3 32B ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 32B or Ministral 3 14B 2512?
Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs $0.20 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.21 for Qwen3 32B.
Run Qwen3 32B and Ministral 3 14B 2512 on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.