Compare / Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Alibaba · profile
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Gemini 2.5 Flash? The short answer

  • Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper: $0.72 against $0.85 per million tokens, 16% less.
  • Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 17.7 against 13.1.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.
  • On our business benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher for agents and tool use, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Qwen3.5-122B-A10BGemini 2.5 Flash
Price per million tokens$0.26 in · $2.08 out$0.30 in · $2.50 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.72$0.85
Cheapest host, blended$0.72 (SiliconFlow, FP8)$0.42 (Google AI Studio)
Intelligence Index17.713.1
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second147–
Context window262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3.5-122B-A10BGemini 2.5 Flash
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 89 of 161 74 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 83 of 195 115 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 101 of 187 93 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 107 of 153 66 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3.5-122B-A10BGemini 2.5 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4281,437
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4221,399
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3661,394
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4421,424
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4061,400
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4161,409
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3871,402
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 17.713.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 85.7%79.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 25.2%12.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 75.7%50.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 76.3%65.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 31.1%13.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 93.6%31.6%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.8%99.0%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 11.2%7.8%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better than Gemini 2.5 Flash?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge; Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher for agents and tool use, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs $0.72 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.85 for Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Run Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Gemini 2.5 Flash on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.