Compare / Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs MiniMax M2

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs MiniMax M2

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Alibaba · profile
MiniMax M2
MiniMax · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or MiniMax M2? The short answer

  • MiniMax M2 is cheaper: $0.52 against $0.72 per million tokens, 27% less.
  • They score about the same on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (17.7 and 18.6).
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Qwen3.5-122B-A10BMiniMax M2
Price per million tokens$0.26 in · $2.08 out$0.30 in · $1.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.72$0.52
Cheapest host, blended$0.72 (SiliconFlow, FP8)$0.45 (Minimax, FP8)
Intelligence Index17.718.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second147–
Context window262,144 tokens204,800 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinaChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3.5-122B-A10BMiniMax M2
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 89 of 161 149 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 83 of 195 107 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 101 of 187 167 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 107 of 153 150 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3.5-122B-A10BMiniMax M2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4281,360
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4221,348
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3661,285
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4421,350
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4061,334
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4161,343
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3871,298
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 17.718.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 85.7%77.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 25.2%13.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 75.7%72.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 76.3%64.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 31.1%25.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 93.6%86.8%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 9.0%73.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 39.517.2

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better than MiniMax M2?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or MiniMax M2?

MiniMax M2 costs $0.52 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.72 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Run Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and MiniMax M2 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.