Compare / Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06)

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06)

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Alibaba · profile
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)? The short answer

  • Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper: $0.72 against $4.38 per million tokens, 6.1 times less.
  • Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 17.7 against 7.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
  • On our business benchmarks, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) ranks higher for sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Qwen3.5-122B-A10BGPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Price per million tokens$0.26 in · $2.08 out$2.50 in · $10.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.72$4.38
Cheapest host, blended$0.72 (SiliconFlow, FP8)$4.38 (Azure)
Intelligence Index17.77.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second147–
Context window262,144 tokens128,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3.5-122B-A10BGPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 89 of 161 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 83 of 195 176 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 101 of 187 152 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 107 of 153 105 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3.5-122B-A10BGPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4221,302
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3661,327
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4421,312
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4061,319
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4161,336
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3871,341
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 17.77.70
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 85.7%52.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 25.2%2.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 75.7%36.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 76.3%41.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 31.1%8.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 93.6%28.9%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.8%93.8%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 11.2%9.6%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better than GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing; GPT-4o (2024-08-06) ranks higher for sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs $0.72 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $4.38 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06).

Run Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and GPT-4o (2024-08-06) on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.