Compare / Qwen3.5-27B vs Nova Micro 1.0

Qwen3.5-27B vs Nova Micro 1.0

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3.5-27B
Alibaba · profile
Nova Micro 1.0
Amazon · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Qwen3.5-27B or Nova Micro 1.0? The short answer

  • Nova Micro 1.0 is cheaper: $0.061 against $0.74 per million tokens, 12 times less.
  • Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 22.9 against 5.9.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3.5-27B ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.
  • On our business benchmarks, Nova Micro 1.0 ranks higher for sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Qwen3.5-27BNova Micro 1.0
Price per million tokens$0.27 in · $2.16 out$0.035 in · $0.14 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.74$0.061
Cheapest host, blended$0.54 (Alibaba)$0.061 (Amazon Bedrock)
Intelligence Index22.95.9
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–256
Context window262,144 tokens128,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3.5-27BNova Micro 1.0
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 144 of 161 156 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 78 of 195 181 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 95 of 187 184 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 122 of 153 20 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3.5-27BNova Micro 1.0
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4081,233
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3581,197
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4411,244
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4001,215
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4091,241
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3801,223
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 22.95.90
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 85.8%35.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 23.9%4.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 75.6%29.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 77.7%13.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 32.6%1.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 93.9%14.0%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.8%100.0%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 12.1%5.5%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.5-27B better than Nova Micro 1.0?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3.5-27B ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing; Nova Micro 1.0 ranks higher for sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-27B or Nova Micro 1.0?

Nova Micro 1.0 costs $0.061 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.74 for Qwen3.5-27B.

Run Qwen3.5-27B and Nova Micro 1.0 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.