Compare / Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs R1
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs R1
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 21 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B or R1? The short answer
- R1 is cheaper: $1.15 against $1.29 per million tokens, 11% less.
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 21.4 against 11.4.
- On our business benchmarks, Qwen3.5 397B A17B ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.
At a glance
| Qwen3.5 397B A17B | R1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.55 in · $3.50 out | $0.70 in · $2.50 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $1.29 | $1.15 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.88 (Alibaba) | – |
| Intelligence Index | 21.4 | 11.4 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 90 | – |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 64,000 tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | China | China |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | 65 of 161 | 123 of 161 |
| Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects | 48 of 51 | not measured |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 69 of 195 | 133 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 66 of 187 | 89 of 187 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | 72 of 153 | 110 of 153 |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | R1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,445 | 1,388 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,405 | 1,374 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,476 | 1,402 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,434 | 1,397 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,442 | 1,398 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,421 | 1,382 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 48.2 | 24.6 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 21.4 | 11.4 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 89.3% | 70.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 29.0% | 8.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 78.8% | 39.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 77.3% | 57.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 44.8% | 38.3% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 51.3% | 19.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 40.9% | 6.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 13.4% | 6.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 95.6% | 11.4% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 23.0% | 18.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.33 | 0.30 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 50.1 | 51.8 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B better than R1?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3.5 397B A17B ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or R1?
R1 costs $1.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.29 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B.
Run Qwen3.5 397B A17B and R1 on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.