Compare / Qwen3.6 Plus vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen3.6 Plus vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3.6 Plus
Alibaba · profile
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Qwen3.6 Plus or Gemini 2.5 Flash? The short answer

  • Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper: $0.73 against $0.85 per million tokens, 14% less.
  • Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 27.0 against 13.1.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3.6 Plus ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.
  • On our business benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher for sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Qwen3.6 PlusGemini 2.5 Flash
Price per million tokens$0.33 in · $1.95 out$0.30 in · $2.50 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.73$0.85
Cheapest host, blended–$0.42 (Google AI Studio)
Intelligence Index27.013.1
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3.6 PlusGemini 2.5 Flash
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 61 of 161 74 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 63 of 195 115 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 53 of 187 93 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 81 of 153 66 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3.6 PlusGemini 2.5 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4381,437
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4461,399
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4071,394
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4761,424
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4361,400
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4431,409
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4231,402
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 27.013.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 88.2%79.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 27.8%12.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 75.2%50.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.3%65.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 43.9%13.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 97.7%31.6%
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $5,114.87$548.84

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.6 Plus better than Gemini 2.5 Flash?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3.6 Plus ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing; Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher for sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Plus or Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Plus costs $0.73 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.85 for Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Run Qwen3.6 Plus and Gemini 2.5 Flash on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.