Compare / Qwen3.6 Plus vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Qwen3.6 Plus vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 18 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3.6 Plus
Alibaba · profile
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
3

Qwen3.6 Plus or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct? The short answer

  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is cheaper: $0.64 against $0.73 per million tokens, 12% less.
  • Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 27.0 against 7.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3.6 Plus ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Qwen3.6 PlusLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Price per million tokens$0.33 in · $1.95 out$0.59 in · $0.79 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.73$0.64
Cheapest host, blended–$0.16 (DeepInfra, FP8)
Intelligence Index27.07.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–80
Context window1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3.6 PlusLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 61 of 161 127 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 63 of 195 174 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 53 of 187 165 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 81 of 153 not measured

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3.6 PlusLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4461,304
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4071,285
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4761,298
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4361,293
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4431,318
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4231,292
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 54.511.9
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 27.07.70
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 88.2%49.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 27.8%3.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 75.2%47.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.3%15.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 61.4%4.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 43.9%3.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 97.7%26.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 8.0%10.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 58.226.2

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.6 Plus better than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3.6 Plus ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Plus or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs $0.64 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.73 for Qwen3.6 Plus.

Run Qwen3.6 Plus and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.