Compare / Qwen3.6 Plus vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06)

Qwen3.6 Plus vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06)

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 14 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3.6 Plus
Alibaba · profile
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
14
Shared sources
3

Qwen3.6 Plus or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)? The short answer

  • Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper: $0.73 against $4.38 per million tokens, 6.0 times less.
  • Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 27.0 against 7.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3.6 Plus ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Qwen3.6 PlusGPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Price per million tokens$0.33 in · $1.95 out$2.50 in · $10.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.73$4.38
Cheapest host, blended–$4.38 (Azure)
Intelligence Index27.07.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,000,000 tokens128,000 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3.6 PlusGPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 61 of 161 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 63 of 195 176 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 53 of 187 152 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 81 of 153 105 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3.6 PlusGPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4461,302
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4071,327
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4761,312
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4361,319
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4431,336
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4231,341
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 27.07.70
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 88.2%52.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 27.8%2.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 75.2%36.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.3%41.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 43.9%8.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 97.7%28.9%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 44.1%26.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.6 Plus better than GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3.6 Plus ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Plus or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

Qwen3.6 Plus costs $0.73 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $4.38 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06).

Run Qwen3.6 Plus and GPT-4o (2024-08-06) on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.