Compare / Qwen3 8B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Qwen3 8B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3 8B
Alibaba · profile
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Google · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Qwen3 8B or Gemma 4 26B A4B? The short answer

  • Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper: $0.15 against $0.20 per million tokens, 26% less.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 16.7 against 7.3.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3 8B ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, Gemma 4 26B A4B ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Qwen3 8BGemma 4 26B A4B
Price per million tokens$0.12 in · $0.46 out$0.10 in · $0.30 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.20$0.15
Cheapest host, blended–$0.086 (Darkbloom)
Intelligence Index7.316.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–99
Context window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3 8BGemma 4 26B A4B
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 126 of 161 90 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 166 of 195 100 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 158 of 187 81 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 7 of 153 42 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3 8BGemma 4 26B A4B
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 9.0039.3
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 7.3016.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 58.9%79.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 3.9%19.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 33.5%72.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 0.0%65.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 27.9%40.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 2.2%39.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 2.3%25.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 4.7%12.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 27.8%43.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 17.0%8.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.35
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 28.043.8
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.9%99.8%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 4.8%5.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3 8B better than Gemma 4 26B A4B?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3 8B ranks higher for sticking to the facts; Gemma 4 26B A4B ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 8B or Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.20 for Qwen3 8B.

Run Qwen3 8B and Gemma 4 26B A4B on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.