Compare / Qwen3 Max vs MiniMax M2.7

Qwen3 Max vs MiniMax M2.7

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3 Max
Alibaba · profile
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Qwen3 Max or MiniMax M2.7? The short answer

  • MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper: $0.52 against $1.56 per million tokens, 3.0 times less.
  • MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 22.8 against 15.6.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3 Max ranks higher for writing and sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, MiniMax M2.7 ranks higher for agents and tool use and reasoning and knowledge.

At a glance

Qwen3 MaxMiniMax M2.7
Price per million tokens$0.78 in · $3.90 out$0.30 in · $1.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$1.56$0.52
Cheapest host, blended–$0.37 (GMICloud, FP8)
Intelligence Index15.622.8
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window262,144 tokens204,800 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inChinaChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3 MaxMiniMax M2.7
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 151 of 161 100 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 117 of 195 68 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 96 of 187 108 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 50 of 153 124 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3 MaxMiniMax M2.7
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4191,423
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3931,363
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4181,452
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4131,407
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4231,415
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4051,386
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 15.622.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 76.4%87.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 11.9%29.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 44.1%75.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 50.0%78.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 20.5%39.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 74.3%84.8%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 23.0%36.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.330.38
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 38.637.6

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3 Max better than MiniMax M2.7?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3 Max ranks higher for writing and sticking to the facts; MiniMax M2.7 ranks higher for agents and tool use and reasoning and knowledge.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Max or MiniMax M2.7?

MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.52 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.56 for Qwen3 Max.

Run Qwen3 Max and MiniMax M2.7 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.