Compare / Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 18 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Llama 4 Scout? The short answer
- Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.28 against $0.35 per million tokens, 19% less.
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 9.6 against 8.1.
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct writes faster: 180 tokens a second against 42.
- On our business benchmarks, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
- On our business benchmarks, Llama 4 Scout ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
At a glance
| Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.10 in · $1.10 out | $0.18 in · $0.59 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.35 | $0.28 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.27 (Alibaba) | $0.15 (DeepInfra, FP8) |
| Intelligence Index | 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 180 | 42 |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,310,720 tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | China | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | not measured | 148 of 161 |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 140 of 195 | 164 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 104 of 187 | 163 of 187 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | 117 of 153 | 46 of 153 |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,411 | 1,316 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,313 | 1,289 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,399 | 1,309 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,376 | 1,299 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,399 | 1,322 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,342 | 1,305 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 9.60 | 8.10 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 73.8% | 58.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 7.6% | 3.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 39.7% | 39.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 52.7% | 27.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Output speedtokens per second | 180 | 42.0 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 7.6% | 1.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Time to first answer tokenseconds | 1.05 | 0.63 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 21.6% | 15.5% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 7.0% | 19.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.31 | 0.36 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 41.8 | 26.7 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct better than Llama 4 Scout?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing; Llama 4 Scout ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout costs $0.28 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.35 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct.
Which is faster, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Llama 4 Scout?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct writes about 180 tokens a second on its usual API, against 42 for Llama 4 Scout (Artificial Analysis).
Run Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Llama 4 Scout on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.