Compare / Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Nova Lite 1.0

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Nova Lite 1.0

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Alibaba · profile
Nova Lite 1.0
Amazon · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Nova Lite 1.0? The short answer

  • Nova Lite 1.0 is cheaper: $0.10 against $0.41 per million tokens, 3.9 times less.
  • Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 11.2 against 6.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
  • On our business benchmarks, Nova Lite 1.0 ranks higher for sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingNova Lite 1.0
Price per million tokens$0.15 in · $1.20 out$0.060 in · $0.24 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.41$0.10
Cheapest host, blended$0.41 (Google)$0.10 (Amazon Bedrock)
Intelligence Index11.26.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second182–
Context window262,144 tokens300,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingNova Lite 1.0
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 137 of 161 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 122 of 195 177 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 142 of 187 181 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 64 of 153 25 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingNova Lite 1.0
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3671,269
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3261,221
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3941,262
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3591,244
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3691,260
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3411,240
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 11.26.70
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 75.9%43.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 12.6%4.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 60.7%34.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 63.7%19.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 9.8%0.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 41.5%17.5%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 94.4%99.9%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 9.3%6.1%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking better than Nova Lite 1.0?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing; Nova Lite 1.0 ranks higher for sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Nova Lite 1.0?

Nova Lite 1.0 costs $0.10 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.41 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.

Run Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Nova Lite 1.0 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.