Compare / Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Nova Micro 1.0
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Nova Micro 1.0
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Nova Micro 1.0? The short answer
- Nova Micro 1.0 is cheaper: $0.061 against $0.41 per million tokens, 6.7 times less.
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 11.2 against 5.9.
- Nova Micro 1.0 writes faster: 256 tokens a second against 182.
- On our business benchmarks, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.
- On our business benchmarks, Nova Micro 1.0 ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
At a glance
| Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Nova Micro 1.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.15 in · $1.20 out | $0.035 in · $0.14 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.41 | $0.061 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.41 (Google) | $0.061 (Amazon Bedrock) |
| Intelligence Index | 11.2 | 5.9 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 182 | 256 |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Developer based in | China | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Nova Micro 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | 137 of 161 | 156 of 161 |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 122 of 195 | 181 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 142 of 187 | 184 of 187 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | 64 of 153 | 20 of 153 |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Nova Micro 1.0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,367 | 1,233 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,326 | 1,197 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,394 | 1,244 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,359 | 1,215 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,369 | 1,241 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,341 | 1,223 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 11.2 | 5.90 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 75.9% | 35.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 12.6% | 4.6% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 60.7% | 29.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 63.7% | 13.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Output speedtokens per second | 182 | 256 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 9.8% | 1.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Time to first answer tokenseconds | 12.1 | 0.58 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 41.5% | 14.0% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 94.4% | 100.0% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 9.3% | 5.5% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking better than Nova Micro 1.0?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing; Nova Micro 1.0 ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Nova Micro 1.0?
Nova Micro 1.0 costs $0.061 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.41 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.
Which is faster, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Nova Micro 1.0?
Nova Micro 1.0 writes about 256 tokens a second on its usual API, against 182 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking (Artificial Analysis).
Run Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Nova Micro 1.0 on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.