Compare / Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Step 3.5 Flash

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Step 3.5 Flash

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Alibaba · profile
Step 3.5 Flash
Stepfun · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Step 3.5 Flash? The short answer

  • Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper: $0.15 against $0.41 per million tokens, 2.7 times less.
  • Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 16.6 against 11.2.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, Step 3.5 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingStep 3.5 Flash
Price per million tokens$0.15 in · $1.20 out$0.10 in · $0.30 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.41$0.15
Cheapest host, blended$0.41 (Google)–
Intelligence Index11.216.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second182–
Context window262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinaChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingStep 3.5 Flash
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 137 of 161 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 122 of 195 96 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 142 of 187 99 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 64 of 153 123 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingStep 3.5 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3671,390
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3261,345
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3941,429
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3591,384
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3691,393
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3411,366
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 11.216.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 75.9%83.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 12.6%21.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 60.7%64.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 63.7%50.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 9.8%27.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 41.5%94.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 67.0%42.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.280.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 27.245.9

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking better than Step 3.5 Flash?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking ranks higher for sticking to the facts; Step 3.5 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.41 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.

Run Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Step 3.5 Flash on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.