Compare / Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Alibaba · profile
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct or MiMo-V2.5? The short answer

  • MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper: $0.21 against $0.60 per million tokens, 2.9 times less.
  • MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 25.2 against 9.9.
  • On our business benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo-V2.5
Price per million tokens$0.30 in · $1.50 out$0.17 in · $0.34 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.60$0.21
Cheapest host, blended$0.37 (DeepInfra, FP8)$0.15 (GMICloud, FP8)
Intelligence Index9.925.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window262,144 tokens1,050,000 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinaChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo-V2.5
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls not measured 95 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 143 of 195 74 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 91 of 187 60 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 125 of 153 83 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo-V2.5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4141,439
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4401,441
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3571,394
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4401,470
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4091,430
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4131,434
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3881,412
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 9.9025.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 71.2%84.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 6.6%27.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 42.7%67.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 32.7%73.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 6.8%41.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 35.1%90.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 19.0%16.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.40
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 43.056.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct better than MiMo-V2.5?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, MiMo-V2.5 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.21 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.60 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

Run Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.