Compare / Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs MiniMax M2

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs MiniMax M2

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Alibaba · profile
MiniMax M2
MiniMax · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or MiniMax M2? The short answer

  • MiniMax M2 is cheaper: $0.52 against $1.30 per million tokens, 2.5 times less.
  • MiniMax M2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 18.6 against 13.4.
  • On our business benchmarks, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ranks higher for writing.
  • On our business benchmarks, MiniMax M2 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

At a glance

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingMiniMax M2
Price per million tokens$0.40 in · $4.00 out$0.30 in · $1.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$1.30$0.52
Cheapest host, blended$1.30 (Alibaba)$0.45 (Minimax, FP8)
Intelligence Index13.418.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window131,072 tokens204,800 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinaChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingMiniMax M2
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls not measured 149 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 118 of 195 107 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 125 of 187 167 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 150 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingMiniMax M2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3921,348
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3391,285
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4391,350
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3831,334
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3951,343
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3651,298
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 13.418.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 77.2%77.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 11.9%13.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 56.5%72.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 63.7%64.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 11.4%25.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 54.1%86.8%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 30.0%73.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.340.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 32.317.2

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking better than MiniMax M2?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ranks higher for writing; MiniMax M2 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or MiniMax M2?

MiniMax M2 costs $0.52 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.30 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Run Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and MiniMax M2 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.