Compare / Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs o4 Mini

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs o4 Mini

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Alibaba · profile
o4 Mini
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or o4 Mini? The short answer

  • Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is cheaper: $1.30 against $1.93 per million tokens, 32% less.
  • o4 Mini scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 16.7 against 13.4.
  • On our business benchmarks, o4 Mini ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinkingo4 Mini
Price per million tokens$0.40 in · $4.00 out$1.10 in · $4.40 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$1.30$1.93
Cheapest host, blended$1.30 (Alibaba)–
Intelligence Index13.416.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window131,072 tokens200,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseQwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinkingo4 Mini
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls not measured 46 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 118 of 195 101 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 125 of 187 98 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 141 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricQwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinkingo4 Mini
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3921,379
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3391,337
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4391,408
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3831,369
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3951,391
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3651,354
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 13.416.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 77.2%78.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 11.9%16.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 56.5%68.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 63.7%61.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 11.4%15.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 54.1%55.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 30.0%19.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.340.33
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 32.346.9

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking better than o4 Mini?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, o4 Mini ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or o4 Mini?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking costs $1.30 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.93 for o4 Mini.

Run Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and o4 Mini on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.