Compare / Nova 2 Lite vs Claude Sonnet 5

Nova 2 Lite vs Claude Sonnet 5

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Nova 2 Lite
Amazon · profile
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Nova 2 Lite or Claude Sonnet 5? The short answer

  • Nova 2 Lite is cheaper: $0.85 against $4.00 per million tokens, 4.7 times less.
  • Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 38.2 against 13.4.
  • On our business benchmarks, Nova 2 Lite ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Nova 2 LiteClaude Sonnet 5
Price per million tokens$0.30 in · $2.50 out$2.00 in · $10.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.85$4.00
Cheapest host, blended$0.85 (Amazon Bedrock)$4.00 (Claude Platform on AWS)
Intelligence Index13.438.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second210–
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseNova 2 LiteClaude Sonnet 5
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 130 of 161 33 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 19 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 112 of 195 32 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 168 of 187 36 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 76 of 153 84 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricNova 2 LiteClaude Sonnet 5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3801,452
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3511,465
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2691,435
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3541,512
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3271,467
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3351,462
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,2981,452
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 23.071.5
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 13.438.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 81.1%91.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 11.6%41.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 60.3%82.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 16.1%80.5%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 45.0%3.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.38
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 23.562.7

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Nova 2 Lite better than Claude Sonnet 5?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Nova 2 Lite ranks higher for sticking to the facts; Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Sonnet 5?

Nova 2 Lite costs $0.85 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $4.00 for Claude Sonnet 5.

Run Nova 2 Lite and Claude Sonnet 5 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.