Compare / Nova Pro 1.0 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Nova Pro 1.0 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Nova Pro 1.0
Amazon · profile
Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Nova Pro 1.0 or Mistral Medium 3.1? The short answer

  • Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper: $0.80 against $1.40 per million tokens, 43% less.
  • Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 9.2 against 7.0.
  • On our business benchmarks, Nova Pro 1.0 ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.1 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Nova Pro 1.0Mistral Medium 3.1
Price per million tokens$0.80 in · $3.20 out$0.40 in · $2.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$1.40$0.80
Cheapest host, blended$1.40 (Amazon Bedrock)$0.80 (Mistral)
Intelligence Index7.09.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window300,000 tokens131,072 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USFrance

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseNova Pro 1.0Mistral Medium 3.1
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 152 of 161 119 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 186 of 195 157 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 173 of 187 110 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 11 of 153 130 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricNova Pro 1.0Mistral Medium 3.1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,2791,407
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2371,378
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,2731,410
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2771,395
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,2901,408
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,2741,386
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 7.009.20
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 49.9%58.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 3.2%4.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 38.1%39.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 21.0%42.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 6.1%10.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 14.0%40.6%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.3%99.7%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 5.1%22.7%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Nova Pro 1.0 ranks higher for sticking to the facts; Mistral Medium 3.1 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.80 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.40 for Nova Pro 1.0.

Run Nova Pro 1.0 and Mistral Medium 3.1 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.