Compare / Nova Pro 1.0 vs gpt-oss-120b

Nova Pro 1.0 vs gpt-oss-120b

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Nova Pro 1.0
Amazon · profile
gpt-oss-120b
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Nova Pro 1.0 or gpt-oss-120b? The short answer

  • gpt-oss-120b is cheaper: $0.26 against $1.40 per million tokens, 5.3 times less.
  • gpt-oss-120b scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 11.6 against 7.0.
  • On our business benchmarks, Nova Pro 1.0 ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, gpt-oss-120b ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Nova Pro 1.0gpt-oss-120b
Price per million tokens$0.80 in · $3.20 out$0.15 in · $0.60 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$1.40$0.26
Cheapest host, blended$1.40 (Amazon Bedrock)$0.065 (CoreWeave, FP4)
Intelligence Index7.011.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–200
Context window300,000 tokens131,072 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseNova Pro 1.0gpt-oss-120b
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 152 of 161 117 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 49 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 186 of 195 110 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 173 of 187 131 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 11 of 153 138 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricNova Pro 1.0gpt-oss-120b
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,2791,351
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2371,277
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,2731,357
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2771,323
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,2901,352
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,2741,309
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 7.0011.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 49.9%78.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 3.2%19.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 38.1%69.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 21.0%52.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 6.1%23.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 14.0%65.8%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.3%99.9%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 5.1%14.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than gpt-oss-120b?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Nova Pro 1.0 ranks higher for sticking to the facts; gpt-oss-120b ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or gpt-oss-120b?

gpt-oss-120b costs $0.26 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.40 for Nova Pro 1.0.

Run Nova Pro 1.0 and gpt-oss-120b on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.