Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V3 0324
Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V3 0324
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 18 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V3 0324? The short answer
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is cheaper: $0.44 against $20.00 per million tokens, 46 times less.
- Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 53.4 against 9.7.
- On our business benchmarks, Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.
At a glance
| Claude Fable 5.1 | DeepSeek V3 0324 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $10.00 in · $50.00 out | $0.25 in · $1.00 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $20.00 | $0.44 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $20.00 (Azure) | $0.44 (SiliconFlow, FP8) |
| Intelligence Index | 53.4 | 9.7 |
| Spring Prompt overall | 65 | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 71 | – |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 163,840 tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Developer based in | the US | China |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Claude Fable 5.1 | DeepSeek V3 0324 |
|---|---|---|
| Product listingsTurning a sparse product feed and photos into listings that can go live | 14 of 19 | not measured |
| Decks from an analysisTurning a finished analysis into a deck you could present as it is | 6 of 18 | not measured |
| Marketing planningPlanning a year of ad spend without overspending | 6 of 18 | not measured |
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | 14 of 161 | 138 of 161 |
| Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects | 4 of 51 | not measured |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 4 of 195 | 152 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 15 of 187 | 92 of 187 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | 4 of 153 | not measured |
| Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) | 22 of 22 | not measured |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 | DeepSeek V3 0324 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,485 | 1,390 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,484 | 1,390 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,516 | 1,398 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,497 | 1,378 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,501 | 1,396 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,496 | 1,386 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 81.6 | 21.2 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 53.4 | 9.70 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 93.7% | 65.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 59.1% | 4.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 85.3% | 40.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 63.1% | 39.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 91.4% | 13.9% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 55.1% | 0.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 47.2% | 4.7% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 3.0% | 32.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.43 | 0.35 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 63.9 | 49.1 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than DeepSeek V3 0324?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V3 0324?
DeepSeek V3 0324 costs $0.44 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $20.00 for Claude Fable 5.1.
Run Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V3 0324 on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.