Compare / Claude Fable 5 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Claude Fable 5 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic · profile
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Claude Fable 5 or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct? The short answer

  • Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is cheaper: $0.12 against $20.00 per million tokens, 167 times less.
  • Claude Fable 5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 49.6 against 5.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Claude Fable 5Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Price per million tokens$10.00 in · $50.00 out$0.050 in · $0.33 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$20.00$0.12
Cheapest host, blended$20.00 (Claude Platform on AWS)$0.12 (Parasail, BF16)
Intelligence Index49.65.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseClaude Fable 5Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 19 of 161 158 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects 6 of 51 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 9 of 195 183 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 1 of 187 187 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 8 of 153 not measured

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5031,146
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5011,145
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5501,179
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5091,146
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5041,167
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5081,143
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 49.65.70
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.6%25.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 55.5%5.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 63.5%26.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 82.3%4.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 98.5%21.1%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 2.0%31.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 74.210.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.12 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $20.00 for Claude Fable 5.

Run Claude Fable 5 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.