Compare / Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM-5V-Turbo

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM-5V-Turbo

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 33 results on 2 sources that measured both models.

Results as of 8 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-08-4199ce0620fe).

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic · profile
GLM-5V-Turbo
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
33
Shared sources
2

Claude Haiku 5.5 or GLM-5V-Turbo? The short answer

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5: it scores higher (Spring Prompt overall 44 against 11) and costs less.

  • Spring Prompt overall: Claude Haiku 5.5 44, GLM-5V-Turbo 11 (out of 100; how the score works).
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper to run: $0.001 against $0.007 per product listing on CatalogBench (5.8 times less).
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 43.4 against 23.5.
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 is newer: released 7 Oct 2026, against 1 Apr 2026 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
  • On our own benchmarks, on the results both models have: Claude Haiku 5.5 does better for product listings.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Claude Haiku 5.5 does better for reasoning and knowledge.

At a glance

Claude Haiku 5.5GLM-5V-Turbo
Price per million tokens$0.10 in · $0.50 out$1.20 in · $4.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.20$1.90
Cheapest host, blended––
Cost per product listing (CatalogBench)$0.001$0.007
Intelligence Index43.423.5
Spring Prompt overall4411
Output speed, tokens a second235–
Context window1,000,000 tokens202,752 tokens
Released7 Oct 2026 (newer)1 Apr 2026
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseClaude Haiku 5.5GLM-5V-Turbo
Product listingsTurning a sparse product feed and photos into listings that can go live 11 of 20 19 of 20
Decks from an analysisTurning a finished analysis into a deck you could present as it is 10 of 19 not measured
User surveysPlanning a user survey and reading its results without being misled 3 of 8 not measured
Marketing planningPlanning a year of ad spend without overspending 17 of 19 not measured
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 20 of 164 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 19 of 198 97 of 198
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality not measured 77 of 188
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 80 of 152
Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) 15 of 22 not measured

From our research

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureClaude Haiku 5.5GLM-5V-Turbo
CatalogBench measured by Spring Prompt · 3 results
Cost per productUS dollars, lower is better $0.0012 $0.0070
Reliably publish-ready% of products, higher is better 26.8% 1.8%
Reliably publish-ready · sales brief% of products, higher is better 10.7% 0.0%
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 43.4max reasoning 23.5
Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 44.4%max reasoning 17.1%
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 82.7%max reasoning 70.3%
Show all 33 results (27 more)
MeasureClaude Haiku 5.5GLM-5V-Turbo
CatalogBench measured by Spring Prompt · 27 results
Channel compliance% of products, higher is better 100.0% 98.3%
Channel rules broken% of products, lower is better 0.6% 1.2%
Channel rules broken · sales brief% of products, lower is better 0.0% 0.6%
Claims to check% of products, lower is better 0.6% 11.5%
Claims to check · sales brief% of products, lower is better 1.2% 28.9%
Conflicts caught% of conflicts, higher is better 100.0% 100.0%
Content quality% of checks, higher is better 95.6% 63.3%
Content quality · sales brief% of checks, higher is better 96.3% 16.8%
Decision accuracy% of decisions, higher is better 95.6% 61.0%
Failed outputs% of products, lower is better 0.0% 32.1%
Failed outputs · sales brief% of products, lower is better 0.0% 82.1%
Field accuracy% of missing fields, higher is better 91.0% 59.6%
Invented values% of filled values, lower is better 0.8% 3.8%
Missing UK information% of products, lower is better 0.0% 0.0%
Missing UK information · sales brief% of products, lower is better 0.0% 0.0%
Not findable% of products, lower is better 11.9% 5.4%
Not findable · sales brief% of products, lower is better 10.7% 1.8%
Publish-ready listings% of products, higher is better 47.0% 10.1%
Publish-ready listings · sales brief% of products, higher is better 20.2% 0.0%
Unsupported claims% of products, lower is better 32.1% 55.4%
Unsupported claimsclaims per product, lower is better 1.20 2.49
Unsupported claims · sales brief% of products, lower is better 70.2% 17.9%
Unsupported claims · sales briefclaims per product, lower is better 2.46 1.31
Wrong attributes% of products, lower is better 19.6% 13.1%
Wrong attributes · sales brief% of products, lower is better 18.5% 3.6%
Wrong category or variant% of products, lower is better 0.0% 1.2%
Wrong category or variant · sales brief% of products, lower is better 0.0% 1.2%

Quick answers

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than GLM-5V-Turbo?

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5: it scores higher (Spring Prompt overall 44 against 11) and costs less.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GLM-5V-Turbo?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper to run: $0.001 against $0.007 per product listing on CatalogBench (5.8 times less).

Run Claude Haiku 5.5 and GLM-5V-Turbo on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.