Compare / Claude Opus 4.5 vs Mercury 2

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Mercury 2

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic · profile
Mercury 2
Inception · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Claude Opus 4.5 or Mercury 2? The short answer

  • Mercury 2 is cheaper: $0.38 against $10.00 per million tokens, 27 times less.
  • Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 29.1 against 13.8.
  • On our business benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Claude Opus 4.5Mercury 2
Price per million tokens$5.00 in · $25.00 out$0.25 in · $0.75 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$10.00$0.38
Cheapest host, blended$10.00 (Claude Platform on AWS)–
Intelligence Index29.113.8
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseClaude Opus 4.5Mercury 2
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 36 of 161 107 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects 28 of 51 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 61 of 195 109 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 16 of 187 146 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 71 of 153 136 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.5Mercury 2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4591,368
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4721,340
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4691,292
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5031,348
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4831,327
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4741,343
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4671,307
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 29.113.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 86.6%77.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 30.1%17.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 58.0%69.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 77.3%43.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 47.0%26.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 89.5%70.8%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 98.7%100.0%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 10.9%12.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Mercury 2?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Claude Opus 4.5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 costs $0.38 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $10.00 for Claude Opus 4.5.

Run Claude Opus 4.5 and Mercury 2 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.