Compare / Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax M2.1

Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax M2.1

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · profile
MiniMax M2.1
MiniMax · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Claude Opus 4.8 or MiniMax M2.1? The short answer

  • MiniMax M2.1 is cheaper: $0.52 against $11.00 per million tokens, 21 times less.
  • Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 41.8 against 20.9.
  • On our business benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Claude Opus 4.8MiniMax M2.1
Price per million tokens$5.50 in · $27.50 out$0.30 in · $1.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$11.00$0.52
Cheapest host, blended$10.00 (Claude Platform on AWS)$0.52 (Novita, FP8)
Intelligence Index41.820.9
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,000,000 tokens204,800 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseClaude Opus 4.8MiniMax M2.1
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 28 of 161 125 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects 17 of 51 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 18 of 195 86 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 24 of 187 106 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 29 of 153 116 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.8MiniMax M2.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 41.820.9
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.0%83.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 48.7%23.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 62.2%69.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 77.7%67.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 58.3%28.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 94.4%85.4%
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 71.9%41.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 50.0%16.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 62.5%18.8%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 78.8%40.6%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 83.8%68.8%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 84.3%61.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 6.0%31.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.400.41
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 65.941.6

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Claude Opus 4.8 better than MiniMax M2.1?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or MiniMax M2.1?

MiniMax M2.1 costs $0.52 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $11.00 for Claude Opus 4.8.

Run Claude Opus 4.8 and MiniMax M2.1 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.