Compare / Claude Opus 5 vs o1

Claude Opus 5 vs o1

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 12 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic · profile
o1
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
12
Shared sources
3

Claude Opus 5 or o1? The short answer

  • Claude Opus 5 is cheaper: $10.00 against $26.25 per million tokens, 2.6 times less.
  • Claude Opus 5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 50.8 against 15.2.
  • On our business benchmarks, Claude Opus 5 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Claude Opus 5o1
Price per million tokens$5.00 in · $25.00 out$15.00 in · $60.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$10.00$26.25
Cheapest host, blended$10.00 (Claude Platform on AWS)–
Intelligence Index50.815.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,000,000 tokens200,000 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseClaude Opus 5o1
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 6 of 161 not measured
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects 7 of 51 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 6 of 195 126 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 8 of 187 74 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 15 of 153 86 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 5o1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4861,370
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4721,381
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5431,402
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4971,407
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4911,402
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4821,398
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 78.039.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 50.815.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 93.7%74.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 54.9%7.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 82.0%65.0%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 59.9%41.1%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Claude Opus 5 better than o1?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Claude Opus 5 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or o1?

Claude Opus 5 costs $10.00 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $26.25 for o1.

Run Claude Opus 5 and o1 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.