Compare / Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-4.1 Nano

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-4.1 Nano

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic · profile
GPT-4.1 Nano
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-4.1 Nano? The short answer

  • GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper: $0.18 against $6.00 per million tokens, 34 times less.
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 30.1 against 7.8.
  • On our business benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4.1 Nano
Price per million tokens$3.00 in · $15.00 out$0.10 in · $0.40 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$6.00$0.18
Cheapest host, blended$6.00 (Claude Platform on AWS)$0.18 (Azure)
Intelligence Index30.17.8
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,047,576 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4.1 Nano
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 51 of 161 139 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects 31 of 51 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 55 of 195 169 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 30 of 187 162 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 79 of 153 151 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4.1 Nano
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4821,321
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4491,307
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5061,313
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4751,300
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4721,322
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4551,299
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 63.011.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 30.17.80
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 87.5%51.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 33.6%3.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 56.6%32.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 80.0%20.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 71.2%3.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 53.0%3.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 34.4%3.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 79.5%17.3%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 35.5%6.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than GPT-4.1 Nano?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-4.1 Nano?

GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.18 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $6.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.6.

Run Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-4.1 Nano on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.