Compare / Claude Sonnet 4 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

Claude Sonnet 4 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic · profile
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Claude Sonnet 4 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423? The short answer

  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is cheaper: $0.18 against $6.00 per million tokens, 34 times less.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 34.3 against 18.9.
  • On our business benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Claude Sonnet 4DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Price per million tokens$3.00 in · $15.00 out$0.14 in · $0.28 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$6.00$0.18
Cheapest host, blended$6.00 (Amazon Bedrock)$0.053 (StreamLake, FP8)
Intelligence Index18.934.3
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window200,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseClaude Sonnet 4DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 79 of 161 34 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 111 of 195 40 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 68 of 187 62 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 88 of 153 81 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricClaude Sonnet 4DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3871,439
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3951,408
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4331,457
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4151,428
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4021,436
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3981,416
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 37.669.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 18.934.3
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 77.7%90.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 10.7%38.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 70.3%79.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 36.3%78.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 16.7%39.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 4.0%12.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 63.754.6

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Claude Sonnet 4 better than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs $0.18 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $6.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.

Run Claude Sonnet 4 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.