Compare / Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic · profile
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 2.5 Flash? The short answer

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper: $0.85 against $6.00 per million tokens, 7.1 times less.
  • Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 18.9 against 13.1.
  • On our business benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
  • On our business benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher for agents and tool use and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Claude Sonnet 4Gemini 2.5 Flash
Price per million tokens$3.00 in · $15.00 out$0.30 in · $2.50 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$6.00$0.85
Cheapest host, blended$6.00 (Amazon Bedrock)$0.42 (Google AI Studio)
Intelligence Index18.913.1
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window200,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 2.5 Flash
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 79 of 161 74 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 111 of 195 115 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 68 of 187 93 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 88 of 153 66 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 2.5 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3871,399
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3951,394
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4331,424
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4151,400
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4021,409
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3981,402
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 18.913.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 77.7%79.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 10.7%12.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 54.7%50.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 70.3%65.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 31.1%13.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 64.6%31.6%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 98.6%99.0%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 10.3%7.8%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Claude Sonnet 4 better than Gemini 2.5 Flash?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Claude Sonnet 4 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing; Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher for agents and tool use and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.85 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $6.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.

Run Claude Sonnet 4 and Gemini 2.5 Flash on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.