Compare / Claude Sonnet 4 vs GPT-5 Mini

Claude Sonnet 4 vs GPT-5 Mini

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 18 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic · profile
GPT-5 Mini
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
3

Claude Sonnet 4 or GPT-5 Mini? The short answer

  • GPT-5 Mini is cheaper: $0.69 against $6.00 per million tokens, 8.7 times less.
  • GPT-5 Mini scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 20.6 against 18.9.
  • On our business benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4 ranks higher for agents and tool use, writing and sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, GPT-5 Mini ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

At a glance

Claude Sonnet 4GPT-5 Mini
Price per million tokens$3.00 in · $15.00 out$0.25 in · $2.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$6.00$0.69
Cheapest host, blended$6.00 (Amazon Bedrock)$0.34 (OpenAI)
Intelligence Index18.920.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window200,000 tokens400,000 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseClaude Sonnet 4GPT-5 Mini
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 79 of 161 106 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 111 of 195 91 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 68 of 187 117 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 88 of 153 131 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricClaude Sonnet 4GPT-5 Mini
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3871,381
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3951,324
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4331,400
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4151,373
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4021,390
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3981,352
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 37.615.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 18.920.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 77.7%82.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 10.7%21.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 54.7%75.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 70.3%72.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 36.3%3.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 31.1%33.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 16.7%15.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 64.6%71.1%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 98.6%99.9%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 10.3%12.9%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Claude Sonnet 4 better than GPT-5 Mini?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Claude Sonnet 4 ranks higher for agents and tool use, writing and sticking to the facts; GPT-5 Mini ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4 or GPT-5 Mini?

GPT-5 Mini costs $0.69 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $6.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.

Run Claude Sonnet 4 and GPT-5 Mini on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.