Compare / Claude Sonnet 4 vs o1

Claude Sonnet 4 vs o1

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic · profile
o1
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

Claude Sonnet 4 or o1? The short answer

  • Claude Sonnet 4 is cheaper: $6.00 against $26.25 per million tokens, 4.4 times less.
  • Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 18.9 against 15.2.
  • On our business benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
  • On our business benchmarks, o1 ranks higher for sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Claude Sonnet 4o1
Price per million tokens$3.00 in · $15.00 out$15.00 in · $60.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$6.00$26.25
Cheapest host, blended$6.00 (Amazon Bedrock)–
Intelligence Index18.915.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseClaude Sonnet 4o1
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 79 of 161 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 111 of 195 126 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 68 of 187 74 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 88 of 153 86 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricClaude Sonnet 4o1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3871,370
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3951,381
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4331,402
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4151,407
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4021,402
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3981,398
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 37.639.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 18.915.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 77.7%74.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 10.7%7.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 54.7%70.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 70.3%65.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 31.1%12.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 64.6%62.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 4.0%24.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 63.761.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Claude Sonnet 4 better than o1?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Claude Sonnet 4 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing; o1 ranks higher for sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4 or o1?

Claude Sonnet 4 costs $6.00 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $26.25 for o1.

Run Claude Sonnet 4 and o1 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.