Compare / Anthropic vs Meta

AI labs compared · October 2026

Anthropic vs Meta: which AI lab is ahead?

Each lab's best model on sale goes head to head on every kind of work we measure, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. 25 models in all; a lab is only as good as the model you would actually pick from it.

16 models on sale with our resultsAnthropic Best: Claude Opus 5.5 · newest: Claude Haiku 5.5
9 models on sale with our resultsMeta Best: Muse Spark 1.3 · newest: Muse Spark 1.3
Anthropic wins 9Meta wins 0

Kinds of work led by each lab's best model there, of the 9 both are measured on.

Results as of 8 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-08-4199ce0620fe). Models on sale means listed on OpenRouter today.

Anthropic or Meta? The short answer

Anthropic is ahead: its best models beat Meta's in all 9 kinds of work both are measured on.

  • Pick Anthropic for product listings, decks from an analysis, marketing planning, agents and tool use, professional work, reasoning and knowledge, writing, sticking to the facts and speed under pressure.
  • On our overall leaderboard, Claude Opus 5.5 is #1 (85 of 100) and Muse Spark 1.3 is #6 (65).
  • Prices start at $0.20 per million tokens for Anthropic (Claude Haiku 5.5) and $0.058 for Meta (Llama 3.1 8B Instruct).

Head to head

85Claude Opus 5.5
Best Spring Prompt overall score
65Muse Spark 1.3
57.6Claude Opus 5.5
Best Intelligence Index
48.1Muse Spark 1.3
$8.00Claude Opus 5.5
Flagship price, per million tokens
$2.00Muse Spark 1.3
$0.20Claude Haiku 5.5
Cheapest model, per million tokens
$0.058Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
16
Models on sale with our results
9

Each line names the model behind the number. Prices are blended, three input tokens to one output, at the developer's list price where we have read it; see every model's price. Intelligence Index from Artificial Analysis; overall score from our leaderboard.

Which lab is better for what

For each kind of work, each lab's best model there and its rank among every model on sale. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Product listingsTurning a sparse product feed and photos into listings that can go live 6 of 20Claude Opus 5.5 9 of 20Muse Spark 1.3
Decks from an analysisTurning a finished analysis into a deck you could present as it is 4 of 19Claude Sonnet 5.5 14 of 19Muse Spark 1.3
User surveysPlanning a user survey and reading its results without being misled 2 of 8Claude Opus 5.5 not measured
Marketing planningPlanning a year of ad spend without overspending 4 of 19Claude Sonnet 5.5 12 of 19Muse Spark 1.3
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 1 of 164Claude Sonnet 5.5 9 of 164Muse Spark 1.3
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects 1 of 51Claude Sonnet 5.5 8 of 51Muse Spark 1.3
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 1 of 198Claude Opus 5.5 8 of 198Muse Spark 1.3
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 1 of 188Claude Fable 5 5 of 188Muse Spark 1.3
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 2 of 152Claude Opus 5.5 11 of 152Muse Spark 1.3
Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) 15 of 22Claude Haiku 5.5 19 of 22Muse Spark 1.3

Every model, by intelligence and price

Each dot is a model on sale with an Intelligence Index from Artificial Analysis. Up is smarter; left is cheaper. Hover or tap a dot for its name.

AnthropicMeta

020406080 $0.01$0.1$1$10$100 Price per million tokens, blended (log scale) Intelligence Index Claude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5Muse Spark 1.3

On our overall leaderboard

The 6 of their models we rank overall: one score out of 100 across everything we publish (how the score works). Only models with enough of our own results are ranked.

  1. #1Claude Opus 5.585
  2. #5Claude Fable 5.166
  3. #6Muse Spark 1.365
  4. #7Claude Sonnet 5.564
  5. #13Claude Haiku 5.544
  6. #22Claude Haiku 4.57

Benchmark by benchmark

The headline result of every benchmark both labs have models on: each lab's best model and its rank among the models on sale. Green marks the better rank.

MeasureAnthropicMeta
Agents and tool use
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4 · Overall accuracy · BFCL% correct, higher is better 77.5%Claude Opus 4.5 · 1 of 3831.9%Llama 3.3 70B Instruct · 26 of 38
Artificial Analysis · Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks, higher is better 63.6%Claude Sonnet 5.5 · 1 of 10533.3%Muse Spark 1.3 · 14 of 105
Artificial Analysis · Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks, higher is better 91.4%Claude Fable 5.1 · 1 of 11585.4%Muse Spark 1.3 · 10 of 115
Artificial Analysis · τ-bench banking% of tasks, higher is better 47.2%Claude Fable 5.1 · 7 of 11350.5%Muse Spark 1.3 · 2 of 113
Vending-Bench 2 · Money after a yearUS dollars, higher is better $11,182Claude Opus 5 · 3 of 56$6,520Muse Spark 1.1 · 13 of 56
Decks from an analysis
DeckBench · Deck ratingrating, higher is better 1,352Claude Sonnet 5.5 · 4 of 19821Muse Spark 1.3 · 14 of 19
Marketing planning
ROASBench · Overall scorescore out of 100, higher is better 52.0Claude Sonnet 5.5 · 4 of 1934.1Muse Spark 1.3 · 12 of 19
Product listings
CatalogBench · Reliably publish-ready% of products, higher is better 55.4%Claude Opus 5.5 · 5 of 2048.2%Muse Spark 1.3 · 7 of 20
CatalogBench · Reliably publish-ready · sales brief% of products, higher is better 21.4%Claude Opus 5.5 · 7 of 2010.7%Muse Spark 1.3 · 9 of 20
Professional work
APEX-Agents · Tasks passed% of tasks, higher is better 75.5%Claude Sonnet 5.5 · 1 of 3757.8%Muse Spark 1.3 · 12 of 37
GDP.pdf · Professional document tasks% of rubric, higher is better 30.6%Claude Opus 5.5 · 2 of 3127.6%Muse Spark 1.3 · 5 of 31
Reasoning and knowledge
Artificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 57.6Claude Opus 5.5 · 1 of 19848.1Muse Spark 1.3 · 8 of 198
Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 61.4%Claude Opus 5.5 · 1 of 19748.7%Muse Spark 1.3 · 10 of 197
Artificial Analysis · GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 93.7%Claude Fable 5.1 · 8 of 18794.1%Muse Spark 1.3 · 5 of 187
Speed under pressure
BulletBench · Ladder Elo · Bullet 60sladder Elo, higher is better 445Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10 of 2033Muse Spark 1.3 · 17 of 20
Sticking to the facts
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard · Hallucination rate · Vectara% of summaries, lower is better 9.8%Claude Haiku 4.5 · 43 of 797.7%Llama 4 Scout · 27 of 79
Arena (formerly LMArena) · Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 1,507Claude Opus 5.5 · 1 of 1131,483Muse Spark 1.2 · 9 of 113
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) · Correct answers% of questions, higher is better 72.2%Claude Opus 5.5 · 4 of 7360.3%Muse Spark 1.2 · 15 of 73
Writing
Arena (formerly LMArena) · Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 1,505Claude Opus 4.6 · 1 of 1661,494Muse Spark 1.3 · 7 of 166
UGI Leaderboard · Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 74.2Claude Fable 5 · 3 of 13826.7Llama 4 Scout · 120 of 138

Their models, one against one

Quick answers

Is Anthropic or Meta better?

Anthropic is ahead: its best models beat Meta's in all 9 kinds of work both are measured on.

What is Anthropic's best model?

Claude Opus 5.5: #1 on the Spring Prompt overall leaderboard and 57.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

What is Meta's best model?

Muse Spark 1.3: #6 on the Spring Prompt overall leaderboard and 48.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Which is better for agents and tool use, Anthropic or Meta?

Anthropic: its best model there, Claude Sonnet 5.5, ranks 1 of 164 models on sale, against 9 for Meta's Muse Spark 1.3.

Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Anthropic or Meta?

Anthropic: its best model there, Claude Opus 5.5, ranks 1 of 198 models on sale, against 8 for Meta's Muse Spark 1.3.

Which is better for writing, Anthropic or Meta?

Anthropic: its best model there, Claude Fable 5, ranks 1 of 188 models on sale, against 5 for Meta's Muse Spark 1.3.

Which is cheaper, Anthropic or Meta?

Meta's cheapest model with results, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, costs $0.058 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.20 for Claude Haiku 5.5 from Anthropic.

Other labs compared

Which model is best for your product?

Benchmarks aren't your data. We test the models from Anthropic, Meta and the rest on your own tasks, with the cost of every answer.

Talk to usSee the leaderboard