Compare / DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06)

DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06)

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek · profile
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

DeepSeek V3 or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)? The short answer

  • DeepSeek V3 is cheaper: $0.45 against $4.38 per million tokens, 9.7 times less.
  • They score about the same on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (8.5 and 7.7).
  • On our business benchmarks, DeepSeek V3 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

DeepSeek V3GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Price per million tokens$0.26 in · $1.03 out$2.50 in · $10.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.45$4.38
Cheapest host, blended$0.45 (StreamLake)$4.38 (Azure)
Intelligence Index8.57.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window163,840 tokens128,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseDeepSeek V3GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 136 of 161 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 168 of 195 176 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 115 of 187 152 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 25 of 153 105 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricDeepSeek V3GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3501,302
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3491,327
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3481,312
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3431,319
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3581,336
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3561,341
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 8.507.70
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 55.7%52.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 2.9%2.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 34.8%36.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 29.3%41.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 6.8%8.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 22.8%28.9%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 97.5%93.8%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 6.1%9.6%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is DeepSeek V3 better than GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, DeepSeek V3 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

DeepSeek V3 costs $0.45 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $4.38 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06).

Run DeepSeek V3 and GPT-4o (2024-08-06) on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.