Compare / DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
DeepSeek · profile
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct? The short answer

  • Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is cheaper: $0.058 against $0.45 per million tokens, 7.9 times less.
  • DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 14.8 against 6.9.
  • On our business benchmarks, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLlama 3.1 8B Instruct
Price per million tokens$0.27 in · $1.00 out$0.050 in · $0.080 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.45$0.058
Cheapest host, blended$0.45 (SiliconFlow, FP8)$0.025 (DeepInfra, FP8)
Intelligence Index14.86.9
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window163,840 tokens131,072 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLlama 3.1 8B Instruct
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 84 of 161 154 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 105 of 195 173 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 79 of 187 178 of 187

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLlama 3.1 8B Instruct
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4231,210
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4051,177
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4201,191
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4171,211
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4111,182
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 43.55.40
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 14.86.90
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 79.2%25.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 16.4%5.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 57.0%28.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 69.3%18.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 44.9%1.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 31.8%0.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 37.1%16.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 32.0%20.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.370.34
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 54.024.8

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.058 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.45 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus.

Run DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.